Additional Info: Waiting for Forever (2010); Unbroken (2003); L!fe Happens (2011); New York, I Love You (2008); The Last Kiss (2006); Jumper (2008); The To Do List (2013); American Heist (2014)
Report an error
The number of movies Rachel Bilson appeared in correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Snowfall in Milwaukee | r=0.91 | 7yrs | No |
The distance between Venus and Earth | r=0.73 | 12yrs | No |
The distance between the moon and the Sun | r=-0.68 | 12yrs | No |
The number of movies Rachel Bilson appeared in also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)