Additional Info: Camille (2008); Interview (2007); Factory Girl (2006); Just Like a Woman (2013); The Girl (2012); So Good to See You (2016); An Imperfect Murder (2017); National Theatre Live: Cat on a Hot Tin Roof (2018); American Woman (2018); Wander Darkly (2020); War & Grace (2020); Indomitable (2023); Layer Cake (2004); Casanova (2005); The Edge of Love (2008); Yellow (2012); American Sniper (2014); Burnt (2015); 2 Jacks (2012); 21 Bridges (2019); North Star (2023); The Mysteries of Pittsburgh (2008); The Lost City of Z (2017); Unfinished Business (2015); Mississippi Grind (2015); High-Rise (2015); The Catcher Was a Spy (2018); The Tale of Thomas Burberry (2016); Foxcatcher (2014); A Fox's Tale (2008); Scandalous: Phone Hacking on Trial (2023); Stardust (2007); A Case of You (2013); Live by Night (2016); G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra (2009); The September Issue (2009); Die Clint Eastwood Story (2018); Alfie (2004); Nous York (2012); South Kensington (2001); One Soldier's Story: The Journey of American Sniper (2015); The Making Of 'American Sniper' (2015)
Report an error
The number of movies Sienna Miller appeared in correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Exxon Mobil's stock price (XOM) | r=0.67 | 22yrs | No |
The number of movies Sienna Miller appeared in also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)