Additional Info: London (2005); The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (2003); Easy Virtue (2008); Powder Blue (2009); The Tall Man (2012); Accidental Love (2015); Spark: A Space Tail (2016); Crazy About Tiffany's (2016); Chainsaw Redux: Making a Massacre (2004); It's a Digital World (1994); JT: Reflections (2013); Eve Before (2018); In the Shadow of the Tall Man (2012); Stealth (2005); Summer Catch (2001); Home of the Brave (2006); Blade: Trinity (2004); Total Recall (2012); I'll Be Home for Christmas (1998); Playing for Keeps (2012); Summit on the Summit (2010); The Truth About Emanuel (2014); Hole in the Paper Sky (2008); Bleeding Heart (2015); A Kind of Murder (2016); The Illusionist (2006); I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry (2007); Planet 51 (2009); The Book of Love (2017); Next (2007); The Rules of Attraction (2002); The Merchants of Cool (2001); Shock and Awe (2018); The A-Team (2010); Ulee's Gold (1997); Valentine's Day (2010); Elizabethtown (2005); Killers Kill, Dead Men Die (2007); Hitchcock (2012); Cellular (2004); New Year's Eve (2011)
Report an error
The number of movies Jessica Biel appeared in correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of hearing aid specialists in Maryland | r=0.93 | 7yrs | Yes! |
The number of movies Jessica Biel appeared in also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)