Report an error
Votes for Republican Senators in Wisconsin correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of security guards in Wisconsin | r=0.94 | 6yrs | No |
Google searches for 'used treadmills for sale' | r=0.85 | 6yrs | No |
The number of movies Dakota Fanning appeared in | r=0.74 | 6yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Amberly | r=0.67 | 15yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to delete browsing history' | r=0.64 | 6yrs | No |
Votes for Republican Senators in Wisconsin also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)