Report an error
Popularity of the first name Ruth correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Google's Annual Global Revenue | r=0.99 | 21yrs | No |
| Associates degrees awarded in gender studies | r=0.99 | 11yrs | No |
| NIKE, Inc.'s stock price (NKE) | r=0.98 | 21yrs | No |
| Sales of LP/Vinyl Albums | r=0.98 | 30yrs | Yes! |
| Texas Instruments' stock price (TXN) | r=0.98 | 21yrs | No |
| Analog Devices' stock price (ADI) | r=0.97 | 21yrs | Yes! |
| Google's Net Income | r=0.97 | 19yrs | No |
| United Rentals' stock price (URI) | r=0.96 | 21yrs | Yes! |
| Cisco Systems' stock price (CSCO) | r=0.94 | 21yrs | No |
| Ameriprise Financial's stock price (AMP) | r=0.93 | 17yrs | Yes! |
| Google searches for 'i have a headache' | r=0.91 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Ruth also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)