Report an error
Votes for Republican Senators in Maine correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of aircraft mechanics in Maine | r=0.98 | 6yrs | Yes! |
The number of lawyers in Maine | r=0.87 | 6yrs | No |
Google searches for 'suez canal' | r=0.84 | 6yrs | No |
The number of graphic designers in Maine | r=0.83 | 6yrs | No |
The distance between the Sun and Earth | r=0.77 | 16yrs | No |
Barclays' stock price (BCS) | r=0.76 | 7yrs | No |
The number of movies Monica Bellucci appeared in | r=0.76 | 10yrs | No |
Number of turnovers by Chris Paul in the Regular NBA season | r=0.74 | 6yrs | No |
Global Per Capita Rice Consumption | r=0.72 | 7yrs | No |
US average dairy skim-solid content of whey products (net) | r=0.65 | 8yrs | No |
Sherbet consumption | r=0.64 | 11yrs | No |
Citigroup's stock price (C) | r=0.63 | 7yrs | No |
Mega millions lottery numbers | r=0.63 | 7yrs | No |
Google searches for 'E.T. phone home' | r=0.63 | 6yrs | No |
The distance between Venus and Earth | r=0.53 | 16yrs | No |
Votes for Republican Senators in Maine also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)