Report an error
Votes for Democratic Senators in Kansas correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The Winning Score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship | r=0.9 | 9yrs | No |
Kerosene used in Guyana | r=0.82 | 12yrs | Yes! |
Carjackings in the US | r=0.79 | 7yrs | No |
Grocery store spend in Kansas | r=0.7 | 6yrs | No |
Brick cheese consumption | r=0.65 | 6yrs | No |
Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series | r=0.58 | 11yrs | No |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Kansas also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)