Report an error
Votes for Libertarian Senators in Delaware correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Kiribati | r=1 | 6yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Belarus | r=0.92 | 8yrs | No |
Russia men's national volleyball team placement in FIVB Volleyball World League | r=0.92 | 7yrs | No |
Food spending in Delaware | r=0.84 | 6yrs | No |
US production of whey products (net) | r=0.8 | 6yrs | No |
US production of sour cream | r=0.79 | 6yrs | No |
US production of cheese (other than cottage cheese) | r=0.77 | 6yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Ariel | r=0.71 | 10yrs | No |
Votes for Libertarian Senators in Delaware also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)