Report an error
Votes for Democratic Senators in Wyoming correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Exelon's stock price (EXC) | r=0.92 | 6yrs | No |
Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' stock price (PBR) | r=0.9 | 6yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in Niue | r=0.87 | 7yrs | Yes! |
Entergy's stock price (ETR) | r=0.85 | 6yrs | No |
US household spending on entertainment | r=0.83 | 7yrs | No |
TotalEnergies SE's stock price (TTE) | r=0.73 | 6yrs | No |
Detroit Tigers' American League Ranking | r=0.61 | 15yrs | No |
Rain in Perth | r=0.57 | 15yrs | No |
US household spending on natural gas | r=0.55 | 7yrs | No |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Wyoming also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)