Report an error
Domino's Pizza Group's Earnings per Share correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Air pollution in Lincoln, Nebraska | r=0.92 | 7yrs | No |
Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States | r=0.91 | 10yrs | No |
Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins | r=0.89 | 11yrs | No |
The number of production, planning, and expediting clerks in Idaho | r=0.81 | 20yrs | Yes! |
The number of surgens in Arkansas | r=0.78 | 16yrs | No |
Google searches for 'Taylor Swift' | r=0.76 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Reed | r=0.68 | 20yrs | No |
Yogurt consumption | r=0.66 | 19yrs | No |
Google searches for 'what is love' | r=0.66 | 19yrs | No |
Number of home runs hit by Matt Kemp | r=0.61 | 15yrs | No |
Votes for Republican Senators in Kansas | r=-0.95 | 6yrs | Yes! |
Domino's Pizza Group's Earnings per Share also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)