Report an error
Votes for Republican Senators in Nevada correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Abdullah | r=0.97 | 15yrs | No |
Google searches for 'im not even mad' | r=0.96 | 6yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in Finland | r=0.94 | 14yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Nevada | r=0.93 | 15yrs | Yes! |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.93 | 14yrs | Yes! |
Hydopower energy generated in Norway | r=0.89 | 14yrs | No |
Votes for Republican Senators in Nevada also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)