Report an error
Votes for Democratic Senators in Minnesota correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of optometrists in Minnesota | r=0.95 | 6yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in Papua New Guinea | r=0.92 | 14yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'how to treat a snake bite' | r=0.88 | 6yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Albania | r=0.86 | 14yrs | No |
Points Scored by the losing team in the Super Bowl | r=0.77 | 16yrs | No |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Minnesota also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)