Report an error
Votes for Republican Senators in Delaware correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Searches for 'never gonna give you up' | r=0.95 | 7yrs | No |
Number of times 21 was a winning Mega Millions number | r=0.91 | 7yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'who is donald trump' | r=0.9 | 6yrs | No |
Google searches for 'where can i stream friends' | r=0.89 | 6yrs | Yes! |
xkcd comics published about statistics | r=0.88 | 6yrs | No |
Votes for Republican Senators in Delaware also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)