Report an error
Votes for Democratic Senators in Alabama correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Cheniere Energy's stock price (LNG) | r=0.99 | 6yrs | No |
Average Cost of a 30-Second Ad Commercial during the Academy Awards | r=0.98 | 6yrs | No |
Electronic Arts' stock price (EA) | r=0.97 | 6yrs | No |
Prologis' stock price (PLD) | r=0.95 | 6yrs | No |
Russia men's national volleyball team placement in FIVB Volleyball World League | r=0.93 | 7yrs | No |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Kyrgyzstan | r=0.9 | 9yrs | Yes! |
The number of movies Michelle Pfeiffer appeared in | r=0.9 | 7yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on other household products | r=0.88 | 6yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on bakery products | r=0.86 | 6yrs | No |
McDonald's American Customer Satisfaction Index Score | r=0.77 | 6yrs | No |
Muenster cheese consumption | r=0.76 | 8yrs | No |
The distance between the moon and the Sun | r=-0.53 | 14yrs | No |
Votes for Democratic Senators in Alabama also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)