Report an error
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Texas correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
US household spending on prescription drugs | r=0.98 | 6yrs | No |
The number of movies Jude Law appeared in | r=0.97 | 6yrs | No |
Bankruptcy filings in the US | r=0.96 | 6yrs | No |
US household spending on alcoholic beverages | r=0.94 | 6yrs | No |
Air pollution in Lubbock, Texas | r=0.69 | 7yrs | No |
Air pollution in Houston | r=0.67 | 11yrs | No |
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Texas also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)