Report an error
Popularity of the first name Malcolm correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Solar power generated in Russia | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
| Paypal's Number of Active Registered User Accounts | r=0.99 | 13yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'buy a house' | r=0.97 | 19yrs | No |
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals' stock price (VRTX) | r=0.97 | 21yrs | No |
| Average length of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos | r=0.96 | 16yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'sushi near me' | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
| The number of movies Denzel Washington appeared in | r=0.64 | 46yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Malcolm also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)