Report an error
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in New York correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Kyler | r=0.94 | 12yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Australia | r=0.92 | 11yrs | No |
Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins | r=0.92 | 10yrs | No |
USA Population | r=0.87 | 12yrs | No |
Air quality in New York City | r=0.87 | 11yrs | No |
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in New York also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)