Report an error
Popularity of the first name Sophie correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Master's degrees awarded in Education | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
| Average length of Technology Connections YouTube videos | r=0.95 | 8yrs | No |
| Average number of comments on Technology Connections YouTube videos | r=0.94 | 8yrs | No |
| Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.92 | 44yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in California | r=0.92 | 47yrs | No |
| Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in New Mexico | r=0.92 | 12yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in New York | r=0.9 | 47yrs | No |
| Yogurt consumption | r=0.89 | 32yrs | No |
| Air quality in Los Angeles | r=0.88 | 43yrs | No |
| Cia Paranaense De Energia Copel's stock price (ELP) | r=0.86 | 21yrs | No |
| Vale S.A.'s stock price (VALE) | r=0.85 | 20yrs | No |
| Dried manure used for fertilizer in the US | r=0.59 | 30yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Sophie also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)