Report an error
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Florida correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Number of public school students in 7th grade | r=0.96 | 8yrs | No |
Petroluem consumption in Somalia | r=0.94 | 11yrs | No |
Average SAT score in math | r=0.86 | 8yrs | No |
Air pollution in Tampa, Florida | r=0.78 | 8yrs | No |
American cheese consumption | r=0.75 | 8yrs | No |
Inflation in the US | r=0.73 | 8yrs | No |
Gender pay gap in the U.S. | r=0.72 | 8yrs | No |
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Florida also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)