Report an error
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in California correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Biomass power generated in Uganda | r=0.96 | 6yrs | No |
The number of movies Rachel Weisz appeared in | r=0.94 | 6yrs | No |
Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags | r=0.94 | 8yrs | Yes! |
The number of movies Idris Elba appeared in | r=0.93 | 6yrs | No |
The number of movies Zoe Saldana appeared in | r=0.92 | 6yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on personal care products and services | r=0.91 | 6yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Thaddeus | r=0.91 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Number of websites on the internet | r=0.9 | 7yrs | No |
US household spending on telephone services | r=0.89 | 6yrs | No |
The number of movies Cameron Diaz appeared in | r=0.89 | 6yrs | No |
Automotive recalls for issues with the Parking Brake | r=0.87 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Christmas Price Index in the United States | r=0.86 | 8yrs | No |
US Shoe Store Sales | r=0.86 | 8yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Rosemary | r=0.83 | 11yrs | No |
Air quality in San Jose, California | r=0.76 | 11yrs | No |
The number of games in the World Series | r=0.64 | 11yrs | No |
The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in | r=0.62 | 11yrs | No |
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in California also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)