Report an error
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Texas correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Frank Lampard's Premier League goal tally | r=0.99 | 6yrs | No |
| Annual US household spending on fish and seafood | r=0.99 | 6yrs | No |
| Inflation in the US | r=0.94 | 8yrs | No |
| Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States | r=0.93 | 8yrs | No |
| US Tree Nut Consumption per Person | r=0.93 | 6yrs | No |
| Automotive recalls issued by BMW of North America | r=0.93 | 12yrs | Yes! |
| Italian-type cheese consumption | r=0.89 | 7yrs | No |
| Average temperature in Austin | r=0.87 | 12yrs | No |
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in Texas also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
