Report an error
Popularity of the first name Callie correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Electricity generation in Brazil | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No |
Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.96 | 43yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Norway | r=0.9 | 42yrs | No |
Average views of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos | r=0.89 | 16yrs | No |
Votes for Libertarian Senators in North Carolina | r=0.87 | 12yrs | No |
The number of personal financial advisors in Idaho | r=0.83 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Mayfield, Kentucky | r=0.82 | 13yrs | Yes! |
Average temperature in Miami | r=0.79 | 48yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Callie also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)