Additional Info: Current total views of videos released that year.
Report an error
Average views of CGP Grey YouTube videos correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Air quality in Gaffney, South Carolina | r=0.94 | 6yrs | No |
The number of budget analysts in Nebraska | r=0.89 | 12yrs | No |
The number of detectives and criminal investigators in Maine | r=0.89 | 12yrs | No |
Google searches for 'burn centers' | r=0.87 | 13yrs | No |
Google searches for 'sleepwalking' | r=0.82 | 13yrs | Yes! |
The distance between Neptune and Jupiter | r=0.81 | 13yrs | No |
Average views of CGP Grey YouTube videos also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)