Additional Info: Current total views of videos released that year.
Report an error
Total views on 'Be Smart' science YouTube videos correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of janitors and cleaners in District of Columbia | r=0.94 | 10yrs | No |
The number of biolmedical engineers in Colorado | r=0.93 | 6yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Bulgaria | r=0.92 | 9yrs | No |
The number of opticians in Nebraska | r=0.91 | 10yrs | No |
The number of occupational health and safety technicians in Missouri | r=0.91 | 10yrs | No |
The number of flight attendants in Texas | r=0.91 | 8yrs | No |
Drenching rain in San Diego | r=0.9 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Robyn | r=0.88 | 10yrs | No |
Number of Samsung Electronics Employees Worldwide | r=0.85 | 10yrs | No |
Global Apple iPhone Sales in Q3 | r=0.82 | 6yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in Niger | r=0.8 | 9yrs | No |
AIG's stock price (AIG) | r=0.79 | 11yrs | No |
Number of websites on the internet | r=0.73 | 6yrs | No |
Robberies in New Mexico | r=0.72 | 10yrs | No |
Wells Fargo & Company's stock price (WFC) | r=0.61 | 11yrs | No |
Associate Professor salaries in the US | r=0.58 | 9yrs | No |
Total views on 'Be Smart' science YouTube videos also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)