Report an error
Popularity of the first name Robin correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Kerosene used in Mexico | r=0.99 | 40yrs | No |
| Average number of milk cows in the United States | r=0.97 | 43yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'my cat scratched me' | r=0.93 | 15yrs | No |
| Burglaries in New York | r=0.92 | 38yrs | No |
| Pfizer's stock price (PFE) | r=0.92 | 21yrs | No |
| American Express Company's stock price (AXP) | r=0.9 | 21yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Robin also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)