Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.
Report an error
How 'hip and with it' MrBeast's YouTube video titles are correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Air quality in Napa, California | r=0.96 | 10yrs | No |
The number of musicians in Arizona | r=0.93 | 7yrs | No |
The number of athletic trainers in South Carolina | r=0.87 | 11yrs | No |
Google searches for 'sushi near me' | r=0.76 | 12yrs | No |
McDonald's stock price (MCD) | r=0.73 | 12yrs | No |
How 'hip and with it' MrBeast's YouTube video titles are also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)