Additional Info: Current total views of videos released that year.
Report an error
Average views of The Game Theorists YouTube videos correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Number of Samsung Electronics Employees Worldwide | r=0.98 | 14yrs | No |
The number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Arkansas | r=0.96 | 13yrs | No |
Number of times 5 was a winning Mega Millions number | r=0.94 | 12yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to make baby' | r=0.94 | 15yrs | Yes! |
Viewership of "The Big Bang Theory" | r=0.91 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Kennedy | r=0.89 | 14yrs | No |
Number of Walmart stores worldwide | r=0.89 | 14yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to make baby' | r=0.87 | 15yrs | No |
Average views of The Game Theorists YouTube videos also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)