Report an error
Average length of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of airline pilots, copilots, and flight engineers in Washington | r=1 | 6yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in Japan | r=1 | 8yrs | No |
The number of industrial machinery mechanics in Arkansas | r=0.99 | 9yrs | Yes! |
Solar power generated in Ghana | r=0.98 | 8yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Mathematics and statistics | r=0.98 | 8yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Communication | r=0.97 | 8yrs | No |
The number of agricultural equipment operators in Puerto Rico | r=0.93 | 6yrs | No |
Average length of Simone Giertz's YouTube videos also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)