Additional Info: Current total views of videos released that year.
Report an error
Average views of PBS Space Time YouTube videos correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of police officers in Iowa | r=0.97 | 8yrs | No |
Snow days in Washington, D.C. | r=0.93 | 7yrs | No |
Number of times 4 was a winning Mega Millions number | r=0.92 | 6yrs | Yes! |
Boston Celtics' NBA season loss count | r=0.91 | 8yrs | No |
Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins | r=0.9 | 8yrs | No |
Number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final | r=0.89 | 8yrs | No |
Snowfall in Washington, D.C. | r=0.87 | 9yrs | No |
Google searches for 'can texas secede from the union' | r=0.78 | 9yrs | No |
Average views of PBS Space Time YouTube videos also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)