Report an error
Average length of OverSimplified YouTube videos correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Solar power generated in Bolivia | r=1 | 6yrs | Yes! |
| Solar power generated in Belgium | r=1 | 6yrs | No |
| The number of merchandise displayers and window trimmers in Oklahoma | r=0.99 | 7yrs | No |
| Master's degrees awarded in Biological and biomedical sciences | r=0.98 | 6yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls' | r=0.97 | 7yrs | No |
| Associates degrees awarded in Nursing | r=0.95 | 6yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'why do i have green poop' | r=0.94 | 7yrs | No |
| The distance between Mercury and the Sun | r=0.91 | 7yrs | No |
| The number of movies Brad Pitt appeared in | r=0.86 | 7yrs | No |
| The number of college computer science teachers in Pennsylvania | r=0.85 | 7yrs | No |
| The distance between Mercury and Earth | r=0.74 | 7yrs | No |
| Bachelor's degrees awarded in consumer sciences | r=-0.99 | 6yrs | No |
Average length of OverSimplified YouTube videos also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)