Report an error
Total comments on Mark Rober YouTube videos correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Master's degrees awarded in Mathematics and statistics | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
Butter consumption | r=0.98 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Solar power generated in Ghana | r=0.98 | 9yrs | No |
US Tree Nut Consumption per Person | r=0.97 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Associates degrees awarded in Mathematics and statistics | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Mathematics and statistics | r=0.96 | 10yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in linguistics | r=0.96 | 11yrs | No |
The number of graphic designers in Washington | r=0.95 | 12yrs | No |
The distance between Saturn and Jupiter | r=-0.94 | 13yrs | No |
Total comments on Mark Rober YouTube videos also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)