Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.
Report an error
How professional-sounding minutephysics YouTube video titles are correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Magnitude 7.0-7.9 Earthquakes in the US | r=0.87 | 10yrs | No |
Citigroup's stock price (C) | r=0.82 | 13yrs | Yes! |
Snow days in Charlotte | r=0.16 | 12yrs | Yes! |
How professional-sounding minutephysics YouTube video titles are also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)