Report an error
Total length of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? | 
| Popularity of the first name Armani | r=0.96 | 16yrs | Yes! | 
| Google searches for 'what is my zodiac sign' | r=0.94 | 17yrs | No | 
| The distance between Neptune and Uranus | r=0.91 | 17yrs | Yes! | 
| xkcd comics published about science | r=0.9 | 17yrs | No | 
| Air pollution in Carson City, Nevada | r=0.58 | 16yrs | No | 
Total length of SmarterEveryDay YouTube videos also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
