Report an error
Popularity of the first name Quinn correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Patents granted in the US | r=0.98 | 46yrs | No |
| Patents granted in the US | r=0.98 | 46yrs | No |
| Number of internet users | r=0.98 | 24yrs | No |
| Electricity generation in Colombia | r=0.97 | 42yrs | No |
| US average dairy skim-solid content of yogurt, nonfrozen | r=0.97 | 22yrs | No |
| Intel Corporation's annual revenue | r=0.96 | 36yrs | No |
| Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.9 | 44yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in Colorado | r=0.9 | 47yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Quinn also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)