Additional Info: I asked a large language model, 'On a scale of 1-10, how _______ do you think this YouTube video title is?' for every video.
Report an error
How nerdy Numberphile YouTube video titles are correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? | 
| The number of firefighters in Nebraska | r=0.98 | 12yrs | Yes! | 
| The number of heat treating equipment setters, operators, and tenders, metal and plastic in Pennsylvania | r=0.92 | 12yrs | Yes! | 
| Gasoline pumped in Afghanistan | r=0.81 | 11yrs | No | 
| The number of movies Emma Watson appeared in | r=0.72 | 13yrs | No | 
| The number of movies Andy Serkis appeared in | r=0.71 | 13yrs | No | 
| The distance between Mars and Earth | r=0.49 | 13yrs | No | 
How nerdy Numberphile YouTube video titles are also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)
