Report an error
Average length of Numberphile YouTube videos correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Google searches for 'how to annex texas' | r=0.94 | 13yrs | Yes! |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Mathematics and statistics | r=0.93 | 10yrs | No |
Lockheed Martin's stock price (LMT) | r=0.92 | 13yrs | No |
The number of economists in Washington | r=0.9 | 12yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to immigrate to switzerland' | r=0.88 | 13yrs | No |
Average length of Numberphile YouTube videos also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)