Report an error
Average length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Associates degrees awarded in Engineering | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Communication | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Physical sciences | r=0.97 | 11yrs | No |
Geothermal power generated in Germany | r=0.97 | 13yrs | No |
Gender pay gap in the U.S. | r=0.96 | 13yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Phoenix | r=0.96 | 14yrs | No |
Patents granted to Boeing | r=0.95 | 12yrs | No |
American cheese consumption | r=0.95 | 13yrs | No |
The number of college computer science teachers in Texas | r=0.94 | 14yrs | No |
Average length of Tom Scott's YouTube videos also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)