Report an error
Snowfall in Washington, D.C. correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
How geeky OverSimplified YouTube video titles are | r=0.9 | 7yrs | No |
Average views of PBS Space Time YouTube videos | r=0.87 | 9yrs | No |
Number of articles Matt Levine published on Bloomberg on Mondays | r=0.83 | 10yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in Sierra Leone | r=0.71 | 8yrs | No |
Google searches for 'n95 mask' | r=-0.45 | 14yrs | No |
Snowfall in Washington, D.C. also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)