Report an error
Hot days in Washington, D.C. correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Google searches for 'Brexit' | r=0.93 | 8yrs | No |
How provocative Deep Look YouTube video titles are | r=0.89 | 10yrs | No |
The number of movies Lupita Nyong'o appeared in | r=0.8 | 13yrs | No |
The number of registered nurses in District of Columbia | r=0.73 | 18yrs | No |
Runner-up Points in Men's NCAA Cross Country Championships | r=0.46 | 48yrs | No |
Hot days in Washington, D.C. also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)