Report an error
Rain in Toronto correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Age of Miss Teen USA | r=0.61 | 17yrs | No |
The number of transportation security screeners in Arizona | r=0.51 | 11yrs | Yes! |
The distance between Venus and Earth | r=0.48 | 18yrs | No |
The distance between Venus and the moon | r=0.48 | 18yrs | No |
The distance between Mars and Earth | r=0.29 | 18yrs | No |
Rain in Toronto also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)