Report an error
Hot days in Sydney correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of secretaries in Oregon | r=0.9 | 13yrs | No |
Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in North Dakota | r=0.87 | 12yrs | No |
How good 3Blue1Brown YouTube video titles are | r=0.86 | 8yrs | Yes! |
Professor salaries in the US | r=0.83 | 13yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in India | r=0.63 | 42yrs | No |
Milk-fat consumption | r=0.56 | 32yrs | No |
The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in | r=0.54 | 42yrs | No |
Hot days in Sydney also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)