Report an error
Freezing temperatures in Phoenix correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count | r=0.99 | 6yrs | No |
Number of edits to the Wikipedia article for spurious relationship | r=0.93 | 6yrs | No |
Christmas Trees Sold in the US | r=0.87 | 6yrs | No |
Frank Lampard's appearances for the England national team | r=0.85 | 6yrs | No |
The number of movies Hugh Jackman appeared in | r=0.8 | 8yrs | No |
Freezing temperatures in Phoenix also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)