Report an error
Rain in Paris correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of movies Timothee Chalamet appeared in | r=0.9 | 9yrs | No |
Air pollution in Dover, Delaware | r=0.87 | 6yrs | No |
The number of groundskeepers in Mississippi | r=0.85 | 16yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in Brazil | r=0.8 | 16yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Clinical/medical lab science | r=0.75 | 9yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in Moldova | r=0.71 | 15yrs | No |
The number of movies Scarlett Johansson appeared in | r=0.71 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Fossil fuel use in Libya | r=0.68 | 16yrs | No |
The distance between Jupiter and Mars | r=0.62 | 17yrs | No |
xkcd comics published about artificial intelligence | r=0.61 | 14yrs | No |
England Football Team's International Match Count | r=0.56 | 17yrs | No |
The distance between Mercury and Earth | r=0.52 | 17yrs | No |
The distance between Mercury and the moon | r=0.51 | 17yrs | No |
Total runs scored in the World Series | r=-0.76 | 10yrs | No |
Rain in Paris also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)