Report an error
Average temperature in Miami correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in Florida | r=0.9 | 12yrs | No |
Google searches for 'who is jk rowling' | r=0.84 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Alonzo | r=0.82 | 48yrs | No |
Genuine Parts Company's stock price (GPC) | r=0.8 | 22yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Raphael | r=0.8 | 48yrs | No |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Cayman Islands | r=0.79 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Kali | r=0.79 | 48yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Callie | r=0.79 | 48yrs | No |
American Electric Power Company's stock price (AEP) | r=0.79 | 22yrs | No |
US Annual Tax Revenue | r=0.74 | 47yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Florida | r=0.58 | 47yrs | No |
The number of movies Kevin Bacon appeared in | r=0.51 | 41yrs | No |
Average temperature in Miami also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)