Report an error
Popularity of the first name Miriam correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| The distance between Uranus and Mercury | r=0.92 | 48yrs | No |
| Air pollution in Hilton Head Island, South Carolina | r=0.91 | 10yrs | No |
| The distance between Uranus and Earth | r=0.91 | 48yrs | No |
| The number of preschool special education teachers in Washington | r=0.91 | 11yrs | No |
| Fossil fuel use in Guam | r=0.89 | 42yrs | No |
| Air quality in New York City | r=0.86 | 43yrs | No |
| Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.78 | 44yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in Arizona | r=0.72 | 47yrs | No |
| UFO sightings in Washington | r=0.71 | 47yrs | No |
| Average number of milk cows in the United States | r=-0.87 | 43yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Miriam also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)