Additional Info: Relative search volume is a unique Google thing; the shape of the chart is accurate but the actual numbers are meaningless.
Report an error
Popularity of the 'y u no' meme correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Google searches for 'Gangnam Style' | r=0.97 | 12yrs | No |
| How 'hip and with it' LockPickingLawyer YouTube video titles are | r=0.96 | 9yrs | Yes! |
| The number of university philosophy and religion teachers in Georgia | r=0.93 | 17yrs | Yes! |
| The number of loan interviewers and clerks in Nebraska | r=0.92 | 17yrs | Yes! |
| The number of chemical engineers in Alaska | r=0.88 | 14yrs | No |
| The number of anthropology and archeology teachers in Tennessee | r=0.87 | 14yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Bryn | r=0.87 | 17yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'pick up lines' | r=0.86 | 18yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'vihart' | r=0.86 | 18yrs | No |
| The number of musicians in Rhode Island | r=0.84 | 14yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'zombies' | r=0.82 | 18yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Aubrey | r=0.75 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'y u no' meme also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)