Report an error
Petroluem consumption in Portugal correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Physical album shipment volume in the United States | r=0.96 | 24yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Samuel | r=0.96 | 43yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Alejandro | r=0.95 | 43yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Kayli | r=0.95 | 43yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Cameron | r=0.94 | 43yrs | No |
Google searches for 'snoop dog' | r=0.93 | 19yrs | No |
Google searches for 'panama canal' | r=0.89 | 19yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jakob | r=0.88 | 43yrs | No |
xkcd comics published about programming | r=0.67 | 16yrs | No |
Petroluem consumption in Portugal also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)