Report an error
Popularity of the first name Celeste correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The average number of likes on MrBeast's YouTube videos | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
Google searches for 'elon musk' | r=0.95 | 13yrs | No |
Tesla's stock price (TSLA) | r=0.88 | 12yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to immigrate to switzerland' | r=0.85 | 19yrs | No |
Google searches for 'fbi hotline' | r=0.83 | 19yrs | No |
Motor vehicle thefts in Washington | r=0.79 | 38yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Celeste also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)