Report an error
Gasoline pumped in Mozambique correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Kentucky | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in West Virginia | r=0.97 | 8yrs | No |
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Virginia | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Killian | r=0.96 | 40yrs | No |
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Louisiana | r=0.96 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Delaware | r=0.95 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Washington | r=0.93 | 11yrs | Yes! |
The number of criminal justice and law enforcement teachers in Idaho | r=0.85 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'who is donald trump' | r=0.81 | 18yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Mozambique also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)