Report an error
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Lithuania correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Popularity of the first name Gracie | r=0.96 | 31yrs | No |
| Associates degrees awarded in Management information systems | r=0.96 | 11yrs | Yes! |
| Popularity of the first name Jaden | r=0.96 | 31yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Ethan | r=0.95 | 31yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Nadia | r=0.94 | 31yrs | No |
| GMO use in corn grown in Indiana | r=0.93 | 23yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Diego | r=0.92 | 31yrs | No |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Lithuania also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)